Toronto – Canada
The one thing that is news, but you mind not find in a newspaper, is the fact that “the news” is going digital. This has wreaked havoc on the paper based business model of journalism. Papers are finding it hard to stay relevant, keep costs low, attract advertisers, retain staff or pay them at reasonable levels. These were some of the issues participants at Social Media Week’s Digital Journalism for Pay were trying to solve. The aim of the night was to discuss alternative business models to print and how a journalist can make money considering their is less money available.
The panelists for the night were Wilf Dinnick of OpenFile, Toronto writer and novelist Bert Archer of Younge Street Media, and Navneet Alang of the Toronto Standard. With the help of moderator Nate Hendley these three tackled the topic of how to provide the news in the digital era and still make money doing it.
First Wilf Dinnick hit the stage and introduced his new hyper-local news site OpenFile. The idea behind open file is that the news is local and suggested by website followers. There is a chief editor for each locale and they decide and allocate resources according to the reader’s desire. Wilf mentioned that OpenFile’s most popular stories are the ones from professional journalists that are paid at competitive rates. He explained that paying journalists a reasonable rate is an important element of providing news in the digital era. He also elaborated on funding models not reliant on advertising, he stated that OpenFile currently is funded by an investor but also concentrates on strategic partnerships with Universities and national news providers such as the CBC and Global. Although OpenFile still gets revenue from advertisers, Wilf should be commended for his approach to offering an alternative news source and his ability to attract funding from different sources.
Secondly Bert Archer explained the alternative funding model of his employer, Younge Street Media. It is an interesting approach where advertising is not considered an essential component of funding. Instead the company seeks to attract “silent investors” who underwrite a particular issue or topic they are interested in. An issue is not commenced until full funding is received after which the editorial staff directs the writers on what to write about and what to avoid. To maintain integrity the underwriters are not mentioned the articles and they do not advertise. This seemed like a viable alternative to advertising, since as Bert mentioned during his talk, online advertising can be fickle and withdrawn swiftly if advertisers are not satisfied with their results.
Navneet Alang focused more on the elements of what makes a successful writer online. He mentioned that generally there are three types of online writing: light quick, opinion and research based, and long form journalism. These are the types of articles he identified as important for a news site to maintain engaged readership.
The three speakers were incredibly well spoken and did a great job of conveying their enthusiasm for the future of digital journalism. For me the most important take away from that night was what Wilf Dinnick explained as a “Journalism business model problem, not a journalism problem.” According to the panelists within 5-10 years a viable business model will emerge, but no one has figured it out yet. This is an exciting opportunity in an industry that has been struggling for some time. Big news to still to come!